Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
185 bytes added ,  18:24, January 7, 2025
Smith's final attempt to smear Trump with a biased, multi-volume "final report" -- a mere 13 days from Inauguration, was blocked by a federal judge in a humiliation of Smith.
Line 7: Line 7:  
By a 9-0 margin on December 22, 2023, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] unanimously rejected a legal stunt by Jack Smith to appeal a district court ruling in his favor to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], in order to expedite the politically motivated trial of [[Trump]] for prior to the presidential election.
 
By a 9-0 margin on December 22, 2023, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] unanimously rejected a legal stunt by Jack Smith to appeal a district court ruling in his favor to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], in order to expedite the politically motivated trial of [[Trump]] for prior to the presidential election.
   −
With the exoneration of President Trump by the American electoral, Dirty Jack's cases had to be dismissed.<ref>https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4976533-trump-prosecutions-lawfare-end/</ref>
+
With the exoneration of President Trump by the American electorate, Dirty Jack's cases had to be dismissed.<ref>https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4976533-trump-prosecutions-lawfare-end/</ref> Smith's final attempt to smear [[Trump]] with a biased, multi-volume "final report" -- a mere 13 days from [[Inauguration]], was blocked by a federal judge in a humiliation of Smith.
    
==Background==
 
==Background==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,152

edits

Navigation menu