Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
316 bytes added ,  04:34, June 27, 2007
Axiom of Choice
Line 529: Line 529:  
[[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]], I was wondeering if you had any thoughts on how we can get a higher listing on Conservapedia articles on various search engines, including Google. I just did a new search today and found that the [[Joseph McCarthy]] is now placing as number 25, which is an improvement. But I think the article should place higher and I'm wondering what we can do to improve the results. Please let me know if you have any ideas on this matter. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:35, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 
[[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]], I was wondeering if you had any thoughts on how we can get a higher listing on Conservapedia articles on various search engines, including Google. I just did a new search today and found that the [[Joseph McCarthy]] is now placing as number 25, which is an improvement. But I think the article should place higher and I'm wondering what we can do to improve the results. Please let me know if you have any ideas on this matter. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:35, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:I hope I'm not out of line in posting here, but have you submitted to the google webmaster program (google.com/webmasters/) They have a sitemap program which may help Conservapedia to get indexed quicker. Other than that, its all about people linking to Conservapedia, especially those with higher page ranks. Just something I thought I'd mention, maybe you already have done this. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 11:55, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:I hope I'm not out of line in posting here, but have you submitted to the google webmaster program (google.com/webmasters/) They have a sitemap program which may help Conservapedia to get indexed quicker. Other than that, its all about people linking to Conservapedia, especially those with higher page ranks. Just something I thought I'd mention, maybe you already have done this. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 11:55, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Axiom of Choice ==
 +
 +
Can you check out the [[Axiom of Choice]] entry, and particularly the symbolic representation?  I've improved it and still plan to add how it leads to a contradiction in the Banach–Tarski paradox, on which we could also use an entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:34, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu