Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
659 bytes added ,  00:07, February 12, 2025
Line 54: Line 54:     
'''5.''' Frequently leading to conclusions that don't logically follow from the presented information. This often manifest itself via making assumptions based on limited data, ignoring relevant details, or interpreting situations in a highly subjective manner rather than an [[objective]] manner.
 
'''5.''' Frequently leading to conclusions that don't logically follow from the presented information. This often manifest itself via making assumptions based on limited data, ignoring relevant details, or interpreting situations in a highly subjective manner rather than an [[objective]] manner.
 +
 +
== How to think more rationally ==
 +
 +
'''1.''' Use [[evidence-based thinking]] and [[critical thinking]]
 +
 +
'''2.''' Use the reasonable person standard used in the field law when engaged in [[decision making]]. "This is a [[common law]] idea, which asks the question of how a reasonable person would have behaved in circumstances similar to those with which the defendant was presented at the time of the alleged negligence."<ref>[https://healys.com/news-events-insights/professional-negligence-and-the-reasonable-person-test#:~:text=This%20is%20a%20common%20law,seek%20the%20opinion%20of%20experts. Professional negligence and the reasonable person test]</ref>
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411

edits

Navigation menu