Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:     
::also: "as a result of the Democratic failure to win the American Civil War." - WHAT? The democrats at the time all were in the south, and had they "won the civil war" the south would have won. I realize that we're trying to keep this as a conservative type thing here, but thats just weird lunacy. I'm removind that part of the sentence. [[User:JamesBenjamin|JamesBenjamin]] 18:18, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 
::also: "as a result of the Democratic failure to win the American Civil War." - WHAT? The democrats at the time all were in the south, and had they "won the civil war" the south would have won. I realize that we're trying to keep this as a conservative type thing here, but thats just weird lunacy. I'm removind that part of the sentence. [[User:JamesBenjamin|JamesBenjamin]] 18:18, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Actually James, that has nothing to do with trying to keep it conservative.  It has to do with a vandal who tried to write in a form to make it seem conservatively ridiculous, as you have noted.  I'm afraid the article is still a bit of a minefield with similar imbedded instances.  Thank you for helping to clear one up. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 18:24, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu