removing personal criticism of another editor; let's stick to encyclopedic edits
Line 85:
Line 85:
There is no need for further explanation on your part. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:10, October 2, 2023 (EDT)
There is no need for further explanation on your part. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:10, October 2, 2023 (EDT)
−
−
== An addendum regarding the So-and-so vs So-and-So past dispute. My apologies for the mistake I made ==
−
−
At the time I was endeavoring to be a mediator/referee between you and RobSmith before you left, I don't think I did enough due diligence in respect to your complaints. I apologize for this. If someone is going to referee, they need to look at the "playback tape" so to speak.
−
−
And looking back, there were signs that the saying "absolute power corrupts absolutely" would kick in as far as RobSmith (Although he never had absolute power).
−
−
I am glad you returned to Conservapedia and I am not the only one who is glad that you have returned. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:24, October 1, 2023 (EDT)
−
−
:Yah, I've heard that same spiel a couple of times myself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 11:29, October 1, 2023 (EDT)
== Thank you for putting the liar and fraud in his place ==
== Thank you for putting the liar and fraud in his place ==