Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Comments from Admin/SYSOP with the username Conservative
I think that when it comes to which article best represents an encyclopedic article the revision done by JoshuaZ should bbe selected. --[[User:Trekie9001|trekie9001]] 19:27, 8 March 2007 (EST)
I think that when it comes to which article best represents an encyclopedic article the revision done by JoshuaZ should bbe selected. --[[User:Trekie9001|trekie9001]] 19:27, 8 March 2007 (EST)
== Comments from Admin/SYSOP with the username Conservative ==
1. Senior Admin Aschlafly (see: http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Aschlafly ) seems to know a lot about the Pope's statements in regards to the Creation/evolution issue. I think he should mediate or arbitrate this particular issue or if he is too busy then more sources should be cited in order to corroborate this matter.
2. I looked at the evolutionists versions and there were many statements uncited by footnotes.
3. I have looked at Ray Martinez's work in the past and I know that he can produce good work. However, I looked at Ray Martinez's version briefly and immediately ran across unencyclopedic language. For example, I found this unencyclopedic: A critical view of Darwinists '''in sheeps clothing''' I also think you should have used footnotes instead of a bibliography since the evo/creo issue can be contentious.
4. I don't think theistic evolution should be such a contentious issue as far as what it is if you stick to the facts. I suggest the two diametrically opposed sides stick to the facts and scrupuously footnote this article since it is becoming contentious.
5. My opinion regarding TalkOrigins.org being a mostly unreliable source is well known. No further comments about this matter in this particular discussion page. I do realize that creationists have people who produce unreliable material as well.
Here is where I suggest creating a new version with footnotes in the body of the work supporting each fact that you state: [[Draft/Theistic Evolution]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:27, 8 March 2007 (EST)conservative