Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Father's right to object to abortion (view source)

Revision as of 03:00, July 7, 2025

318 bytes added ,  03:00, July 7, 2025
→‎Ohio: But Ohio has also established that fathers do have rights in frozen embryos, in ''Kotkowski-Paul v. Paul'', 2022-Ohio-4567, 204 N.E.3d 66 (Ct. App.).
Line 31: Line 31:     
Many of the above decisions have been implicitly overruled by ''Dobbs''.
 
Many of the above decisions have been implicitly overruled by ''Dobbs''.
 +
 +
But Ohio has also established that fathers do have rights in frozen embryos, in ''Kotkowski-Paul v. Paul'', 2022-Ohio-4567, 204 N.E.3d 66 (Ct. App.). "[T]he trial court did not err in concluding the subject embryos are marital property subject to allocation as part of the division of such property." ''Id.'' at  76.
    
== Tennessee ==
 
== Tennessee ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,538

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/2140175"

Navigation menu