| − | In re in re McCabe, 81 N.J. 462, 465, 409 A.2d 1158, 1159-60 (1980) was a decision by the [[New Jersey Supreme Court]] on: | + | ''In re McCabe'', 81 N.J. 462, 465, 409 A.2d 1158, 1159-60 (1980) was a 3-2 decision (remarkably, only 5 justices participated in this decision, but there are many precedents for that) by the [[New Jersey Supreme Court]] on: |
| | {{cquote|The application herein, dated May 5, 1978, brought by more than two citizens of [**1160] the State, asserted that Chapter 84, Laws of 1977, which supplemented the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, N.J.S.A. 56:10-1 et seq., by adding sections 13, 14 and 15, 1 is special legislation not enacted in accordance with the notice requirements of N.J.Const., Art. IV, § VII, par. 8 and N.J.S.A. 1:6-1 et seq. In addition it was asserted that the legislation violated N.J.Const., Art. IV, § VII, par. 7 by adding provisions of a private and special character to a general law.}} | | {{cquote|The application herein, dated May 5, 1978, brought by more than two citizens of [**1160] the State, asserted that Chapter 84, Laws of 1977, which supplemented the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, N.J.S.A. 56:10-1 et seq., by adding sections 13, 14 and 15, 1 is special legislation not enacted in accordance with the notice requirements of N.J.Const., Art. IV, § VII, par. 8 and N.J.S.A. 1:6-1 et seq. In addition it was asserted that the legislation violated N.J.Const., Art. IV, § VII, par. 7 by adding provisions of a private and special character to a general law.}} |