Changes

{{cquote|All parties recognize the aptness of Judge Milmed's comments on the New Jersey Constitution of 1947, that the primary purpose underlying the constitutional provision for the intervening calendar day between the second and third readings was to afford an adequate opportunity to the members of the Legislature and of the public to become acquainted with and study bills that eventually might be enacted into law.}}

{{cquote|All parties recognize the aptness of Judge Milmed's comments on the New Jersey Constitution of 1947, that the primary purpose underlying the constitutional provision for the intervening calendar day between the second and third readings was to afford an adequate opportunity to the members of the Legislature and of the public to become acquainted with and study bills that eventually might be enacted into law.}}

''In re Forsythe'', 91 N.J. 141, 148, 450 A.2d 499, 502 (1982).

''In re Forsythe'', 91 N.J. 141, 148, 450 A.2d 499, 502 (1982).

[[category:New Jersey cases]]

[[category:New Jersey Cases]]