nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: + + + + + +
Plants on the ark?
::# Whether it is intended as a parody or to "be suggestive" is splitting hairs. Either way, it is totally unnecessary. Your assertion that baraminologists are using obscure terms to ignore reality is itself an unsubstantiated assertion.
::# Whether it is intended as a parody or to "be suggestive" is splitting hairs. Either way, it is totally unnecessary. Your assertion that baraminologists are using obscure terms to ignore reality is itself an unsubstantiated assertion.
::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
== Plants on the ark? ==
plants
plants
not included on the ark? survived the flood? comments?
not included on the ark? survived the flood? comments?
{{unsigned|Kcarey}}
Plants were not mentioned as being on the ark, although there would have been plant material for the purposes of food, and this might have included seeds that could be planted after the flood. Apart from that, plants could have survived in floating mats of vegetation outside the ark. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:37, 30 June 2007 (EDT)