Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Oxford College Edition: The Oxford College Edition dogmatically asserts, as liberals like to do, that "Jesus himself left no literary remains" (p.1167) ....
Line 16: Line 16:     
The Oxford College Edition of the Revised Standard Version is the epitome of [[liberal denial]] in its introduction to each book of the [[New Testament]]. Apparently there was not a vigilant [[conservative]] editor to object to how the commentary denies an early date to each book and instead estimates as late a date of composition as can be plausibly imagined, while typically also denying that the named author really composed it.
 
The Oxford College Edition of the Revised Standard Version is the epitome of [[liberal denial]] in its introduction to each book of the [[New Testament]]. Apparently there was not a vigilant [[conservative]] editor to object to how the commentary denies an early date to each book and instead estimates as late a date of composition as can be plausibly imagined, while typically also denying that the named author really composed it.
 +
 +
The Oxford College Edition dogmatically asserts, as [[liberal]]s like to do, that "Jesus himself left no literary remains" (p.1167), when in fact no author other than Jesus for the flawless masterpiece, the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], can plausibly be identified.  ''See'' [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]].
 +
 
==Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition RSVCE==
 
==Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition RSVCE==
  
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,203

edits

Navigation menu