Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,396
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
no edit summary
| url=http://books.google.no/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC&dq=signature+in+the+cell&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4o9T-HHFaSF4gTYqpSSCA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ
| url=http://books.google.no/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC&dq=signature+in+the+cell&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4o9T-HHFaSF4gTYqpSSCA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ
| quote= }}</ref>
| quote= }}</ref>
"To evaluate an abductive argument, focus on assessing the plausibility of the explanation it offers for observed facts. Consider whether the explanation is coherent, consistent with known facts, and the [[Occam's razor|simplest among competing explanations]]. Additionally, check if the explanation accounts for all available evidence and if any alternative explanations are more plausible."<ref>[https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+evaluate+an+abductive+argument&oq=how+to+evaluate+an+abductive+argument&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIICAEQABgNGB4yDQgCEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyBwgDEAAY7wUyBggEEEUYPDIGCAUQRRg8MgYIBhBFGDwyBggHEC4YQNIBCTE3ODE1ajBqNKgCALACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 How to evaluate an abductive argument]</ref>
==See also==
==See also==