Changes

{{cquote|[Simon Peter] saw the strips of linen lying there, as well as the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus’ head -<small>{{Bible ref|John|20|6b-7a|version=NIV}}</small>}}

{{cquote|[Simon Peter] saw the strips of linen lying there, as well as the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus’ head -<small>{{Bible ref|John|20|6b-7a|version=NIV}}</small>}}

These arguments have been made to assert that Scriptures disprove the authenticity of the Shroud, but the second cloth for the head could have been supplemental to the large cloth.

Arguments have been made that the above [[Scriptures]] disprove the authenticity of the Shroud, but the second cloth for the head could have been merely supplemental to the large cloth.

Another critic was the scientist Walter McCrone (1906-2002), who insisted that it was a painting; this possibility has been thoroughly disproven.<ref>[http://www.shroud.com/piczek.htm Disproof that the Shroud is a painting, as explained by a professional artist]</ref>

Another critic was the scientist Walter McCrone (1906-2002), who insisted that it was a painting; this possibility has been thoroughly disproven.<ref>[http://www.shroud.com/piczek.htm Disproof that the Shroud is a painting, as explained by a professional artist]</ref>