Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Michael New (view source)

Revision as of 01:46, July 2, 2007

2,211 bytes added ,  01:46, July 2, 2007
m
Reverted edits by Suffah (Talk); changed back to last version by DrSandstone
Line 1: Line 1:  +
'''Michael G. New''' was an [[American]] [[soldier]] who objected to wearing [[United Nations]] insignia as part of his military uniform during a deployment in 1995 to the Republic of [[Macedonia]] as part of the [[United Nations Preventive Deployment Force]]. Michael New objected to changing his allegiance from the United States to the United Nations ("U.N."). When Michael New enlisted in the U.S. [[Army]] in February 1993, he took an oath to defend the U.S. [[Constitution]] and no recruiter or officer mentioned serving under U.N. command.
    +
But on May 3, 1994, President [[Bill Clinton]] signed [[Presidential Decision Directive 25]] (PDD-25). This ordered submission of American troops to multilateral [[peace]] operations. In July, Michael New was assigned to [[Germany]], [[3rd Infantry Division]], and his company was told it would be sent to Macedonia as part of a "[[peacekeeping]]" mission. In August 1995 Michael New was informed that his unit must wear part of the U.N. uniform.
 +
 +
This new uniform included a blue U.N. cap and a U.N. armband or patch sewn on one shoulder and a blue U.N. beret, in addition to an ordinary United States army outfit. New reported for his formation without these U.N. uniform features, and he was removed by his superiors and eventually [[court-martial]]ed for disobedience under [[10 U.S.C. § 892(2)]] (any person who, "having knowledge of any ... lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order ... shall be punished as a court-martial may direct"). New argued in his defense that the order was unlawful and unconstitutional. Specifically, U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 9 prohibits any person's acceptance of any emolument from a foreign state without [[congress]]ional consent. New also argued that the entire deployment as part of a United Nations force was unlawful.
 +
 +
The military judge and American courts all rejected New's arguments and held that the  legality of the deployment was a nonjusticiable political question. New received a bad-conduct discharge. New has continued to challenge this in the court system.<ref>http://www.mikenew.com/thecase.html</ref>
 +
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/215141"

Navigation menu