Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,848
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,041:
Line 1,041: − − + − ::I trust this clarifies matters. 😀 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:23, August 24, 2025 (EDT)+ − :::Trust the science. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:05, August 24, 2025 (EDT)+
→The power of analytical thinking/multidisciplinary thinking/systems thinking/probabilistic thinking as far as analyzing international politics
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68aa90b6-8588-8003-97da-ced428f8df04 Does ChatGPT use analytic thinking, multidisciplinary thinking, systems thinking, probabilistic thinking when analyzing international politics scenarios?]. If you click the link, ChatGPT does use these frameworks for analyzing scenarios in international politics.
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68aa90b6-8588-8003-97da-ced428f8df04 Does ChatGPT use analytic thinking, multidisciplinary thinking, systems thinking, probabilistic thinking when analyzing international politics scenarios?]. If you click the link, ChatGPT does use these frameworks for analyzing scenarios in international politics.
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a70fe8-a5b8-8003-9f89-d65b4b59461f Will the United States be the leading power for the foreseeable future?], AI : "Yes—the United States is likely to remain a dominant global power for the foreseeable future, particularly through the 2020s and into the early 2030s. Its unmatched military, tech, financial systems, and institutional strengths provide a strong foundation."
::Artificial intelligence query: [https://chatgpt.com/share/68a70fe8-a5b8-8003-9f89-d65b4b59461f Will the United States be the leading power for the foreseeable future?], AI : "Yes—the United States is likely to remain a dominant global power for the foreseeable future, particularly through the 2020s and into the early 2030s. Its unmatched military, tech, financial systems, and institutional strengths provide a strong foundation."
:::There is such a glaringly obvious error here - "'''the''' leading power" versus "'''a''' dominant global power". How can you deceptively preface it with the word, "Yes"? There's a word for this (besides [[intellectual dishonesty]]}. It's called "[[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 12:11, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
:I trust this clarifies matters. 😀 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:23, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
::Trust the science. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 01:05, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
John Mearsheimer is a political scientist. You have brought up Mearsheimer several times to me in arguments where you appear to think that I have to agree with him on everything just because I agree with him on some matters.
John Mearsheimer is a political scientist. You have brought up Mearsheimer several times to me in arguments where you appear to think that I have to agree with him on everything just because I agree with him on some matters.