| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | #Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains: | | #Ask [[Elon Musk]]'s Grok about who will win the [[birthright citizenship]] case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], and Grok falsely explains: |
| | {{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}} | | {{cquote|Legal Precedent: The 1898 case ''[[United States v. Wong Kim Ark]]'' affirmed that children born in the [[U.S.]] to non-citizen parents (not in diplomatic roles) are citizens under the [[14th Amendment]] [FALSE, AS THE PARENTS WERE LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS]. This precedent strongly supports birthright citizenship [FALSE, AS MOST PEOPLE ASSERTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WERE BORN TO PARENTS WHO WERE NOT LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS], and multiple lower courts have ruled Trump’s order unconstitutional based on this doctrine. Overturning ''Wong Kim Ark'' would be a significant shift, requiring a compelling new interpretation of the [[14th Amendment]]. [FALSE]}} |
| − | <ol><li value="3">Ask Google's AI mode: abortion "breast cancer", and it falsely states "Current scientific evidence does not support a link between induced abortion (elective abortion) and an increased risk of breast cancer," when the evidence for a link is overwhelming and proven by studies dating back many decades.</li></ol> | + | <ol><li value="3">Ask Google's AI mode: abortion "breast cancer", and it falsely states "Current scientific evidence does not support a link between induced abortion (elective abortion) and an increased risk of breast cancer," when the evidence for a link is overwhelming and proven by studies dating back many decades. |
| | <ol><li value="4">Google AI falsely states, "The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in [Wong Kim Ark's] favor in 1898, establishing that anyone born within the US, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status, is a US citizen." The Supreme Court held nothing of this sort. Instead, it held that someone born in the U.S. to legal permanent residents in the U.S. who also held citizenship in [[China]], is a U.S. citizen. | | <ol><li value="4">Google AI falsely states, "The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in [Wong Kim Ark's] favor in 1898, establishing that anyone born within the US, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status, is a US citizen." The Supreme Court held nothing of this sort. Instead, it held that someone born in the U.S. to legal permanent residents in the U.S. who also held citizenship in [[China]], is a U.S. citizen. |
| | <ol><li value="5">Ask "[[post-abortive]]" of Google AI and its response downplays how devastating this syndrome is by saying, "This can encompass a range of experiences, including physical recovery, emotional and psychological responses, and ongoing care or support related to the abortion." | | <ol><li value="5">Ask "[[post-abortive]]" of Google AI and its response downplays how devastating this syndrome is by saying, "This can encompass a range of experiences, including physical recovery, emotional and psychological responses, and ongoing care or support related to the abortion." |