Changes

===Re-analysis of samples and other discharge experiments===  

===Re-analysis of samples and other discharge experiments===  

Miller had performed other experiments between 1952-1954 using two other apparatuses. A few vials of the samples he made were found in the 2000s and analyzed using modern techniques that have more sensitivity.<ref name="Bada2016">Bada, J. L. (2016). One of the foremost experiments of the 20th century: Stanley Miller and the origin of prebiotic chemistry. Metode Science Studies Journal, (6), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.6.4994</ref><ref>Bada JL. [https://web.archive.org/web/20190225141103id_/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f46/3e8a3611fa7f25c143991dfddac49c396b73.pdf New insights into prebiotic chemistry from Stanley Miller's spark discharge experiments]. Chem Soc Rev. 2013 Mar 7;42(5):2186-96. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35433d</ref> After modern analysis of his 1950s samples, 31 amino acids, a amines, and 12 dipeptides/cyclodipeptides formed in very small amounts.<ref name="Bada2016" />

Miller had performed other experiments between 1952-1954 using two other apparatuses. A few vials of the samples he made were found in the 2000s and analyzed using modern techniques that have more sensitivity.<ref name="Bada2016">Bada, J. L. (2016). One of the foremost experiments of the 20th century: Stanley Miller and the origin of prebiotic chemistry. Metode Science Studies Journal, (6), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.6.4994</ref><ref>Bada JL. [https://web.archive.org/web/20190225141103id_/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f46/3e8a3611fa7f25c143991dfddac49c396b73.pdf New insights into prebiotic chemistry from Stanley Miller's spark discharge experiments]. Chem Soc Rev. 2013 Mar 7;42(5):2186-96. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35433d</ref> After modern analysis of his 1950s samples, 31 amino acids, 6 amines, and 12 dipeptides/cyclodipeptides formed in very small amounts.<ref name="Bada2016" />

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"