Changes

Many evolutionists, although not all, claim that the distinction between microevolution and [[macroevolution]] is arbitrary because they indicate that microevolution leads to macroevolutionary changes.  In other words, as microevolutionary changes accumulate it leads to macroevolution. However, there have been prominent evolutionists who dispute this matter and argue that the mechanisms underlying microevolution cannot be [[Extrapolation|extrapolated]] to support the general theory of evolution (macroevolution).<ref>http://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=116</ref><ref>http://bioinfo.med.utoronto.ca/Evolution_by_Accident/Macroevolution.html</ref>  

Many evolutionists, although not all, claim that the distinction between microevolution and [[macroevolution]] is arbitrary because they indicate that microevolution leads to macroevolutionary changes.  In other words, as microevolutionary changes accumulate it leads to macroevolution. However, there have been prominent evolutionists who dispute this matter and argue that the mechanisms underlying microevolution cannot be [[Extrapolation|extrapolated]] to support the general theory of evolution (macroevolution).<ref>http://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=116</ref><ref>http://bioinfo.med.utoronto.ca/Evolution_by_Accident/Macroevolution.html</ref>  

[[Microevolution]] and natural selection are accepted to occur by all [[Creationism|Creationists]],<ref name="nat">Numbers RL. Ironic Heresy: How Young-Earth Creationists Came to Embrace Rapid Microevolution by Means of Natural Selection. In: Lustig A, Richards RJ, Ruse M, eds. Darwinian Heresies. Cambridge University Press; 2004:84-100.</ref> but [[macroevolution]] and the limits of natural selection is what is usually disputed.<ref>[https://answersingenesis.org/evolution/?srsltid=AfmBOopLgbKLuo1T0WUtyPAE_oC6BsxXISw-TLyKw37AXTXDbMH77y-v Evolution - Answers in Genesis]</ref><ref name="nat" />

Microevolution and natural selection are accepted to occur by all [[Creationism|Creationists]],<ref name="nat">Numbers RL. Ironic Heresy: How Young-Earth Creationists Came to Embrace Rapid Microevolution by Means of Natural Selection. In: Lustig A, Richards RJ, Ruse M, eds. Darwinian Heresies. Cambridge University Press; 2004:84-100.</ref> but [[macroevolution]] and the limits of natural selection is what is usually disputed.<ref>[https://answersingenesis.org/evolution/?srsltid=AfmBOopLgbKLuo1T0WUtyPAE_oC6BsxXISw-TLyKw37AXTXDbMH77y-v Evolution - Answers in Genesis]</ref><ref name="nat" />

The website Darwinism Refuted points out that finch beak microevolution, which [[Charles Darwin]] wrongly speculated leads to macroevolution, actually helps show that birds remain birds.<ref>[http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_species_02.html Darwinism Refuted]</ref>

The website Darwinism Refuted points out that finch beak microevolution, which [[Charles Darwin]] wrongly speculated leads to macroevolution, actually helps show that birds remain birds.<ref>[http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_species_02.html Darwinism Refuted]</ref>