Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,711
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: − +
→RobSmith desyopping as an alleged "useful idiot of an atheist website" and later re-syopping
So to prevent the consensus view among RationalWiki editors, who mostly had been blocked from the Conservapedia webserver by 2011, from supposedly appearing on Conservapedia, one is led to believe User:Conservative invented the false and negative charge (and violation of [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] against [[personal attacks]]) that RobSmith was "a useful idiot of an atheist website", ignoring Rob's four year record of [[civility]] and abiding by written guidelines. Why would Rob engage in a pointless smear campaign against another editor? There is no record of him doing so. In the smear campaign against Rob, User:Conservative evidently invented it to save himself from the embarrassment of what others who knew him well, and interacted him regularly, thought of his behavior.
So to prevent the consensus view among RationalWiki editors, who mostly had been blocked from the Conservapedia webserver by 2011, from supposedly appearing on Conservapedia, one is led to believe User:Conservative invented the false and negative charge (and violation of [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] against [[personal attacks]]) that RobSmith was "a useful idiot of an atheist website", ignoring Rob's four year record of [[civility]] and abiding by written guidelines. Why would Rob engage in a pointless smear campaign against another editor? There is no record of him doing so. In the smear campaign against Rob, User:Conservative evidently invented it to save himself from the embarrassment of what others who knew him well, and interacted him regularly, thought of his behavior.
The criticism ultimately has to be laid at the owner of the website for not enforcing [[CP]]'s own [[civility]] against [[personal attacks]], and ignoring suggestions to allow creation of a dispute resolution process. Decisions seem to be made on a whim, suggestions ignored, and [[invective]] tolerated. The site originally founded as a [[meritocracy]] has not functioned as one ever since.
The criticism ultimately has to be laid at the owner of the website for not enforcing [[CP]]'s own [[civility]] guidelines against [[personal attacks]], and ignoring suggestions to allow creation of a dispute resolution process. Decisions seem to be made on a whim, suggestions ignored, and [[invective]] tolerated. The site originally founded as a [[meritocracy]] has not functioned as one ever since.
== RationalWiki and web traffic ==
== RationalWiki and web traffic ==