Changes

But it didn't end there. User:Conservative, fearing that "word would get out" what others who had extensive interactions with him and knew his editing practices much better than Rob did, retaliated against the rumors by attacking Rob for his civil engagement with RationalWiki editors. Rob had collaborated with User:Conservative on a few pages in 2007 and saw how Rob's research had been misused and User:Conservative's pointless, silly interaction with RationalWiki editors. Rob withdrew from any further collaboration and limited interaction in the future. The record of [[leak]]ed emails of the private Conservapedia sysop group (leaked by User:TK and hacked by User:AceMcWicked) show virtually no interaction between Rob and User:Conservative between 2008 and to 2015. User:Conservative, in fact, was not a member of Andy Schlafly's original "brain trust" in 2007, as other sysops commented that he seemed a bit odd.

But it didn't end there. User:Conservative, fearing that "word would get out" what others who had extensive interactions with him and knew his editing practices much better than Rob did, retaliated against the rumors by attacking Rob for his civil engagement with RationalWiki editors. Rob had collaborated with User:Conservative on a few pages in 2007 and saw how Rob's research had been misused and User:Conservative's pointless, silly interaction with RationalWiki editors. Rob withdrew from any further collaboration and limited interaction in the future. The record of [[leak]]ed emails of the private Conservapedia sysop group (leaked by User:TK and hacked by User:AceMcWicked) show virtually no interaction between Rob and User:Conservative between 2008 and to 2015. User:Conservative, in fact, was not a member of Andy Schlafly's original "brain trust" in 2007, as other sysops commented that he seemed a bit odd.

So to prevent the consensus view among RationalWiki editors, who mostly had been blocked from the Conservapedia webserver by 2011, from supposedly appearing on Conservapedia, one is led to believe User:Conservative invented the false and negative charge (and violation of [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] against [[personal attacks]]) that RobSmith was "a useful idiot of an atheist website", ignoring Rob's four year record of [[civility]] and abiding by written guidelines. Why would Rob engage in a pointless smear campaign against another editor? There is no record of him doing so. In the smear campaign against Rob, User:Conservative evidently invented it to save himself from the embarrassment of what others who knew him well, and interacted him regularly, thought of his behavior.

So to prevent the consensus view among RationalWiki editors, who mostly had been blocked from the Conservapedia webserver by 2011, from supposedly appearing on Conservapedia, one is led to believe User:Conservative invented the false and negative charge (and violation of [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] against [[personal attacks]]) that RobSmith was "a useful idiot of an atheist website", ignoring Rob's four year record of [[civility]] and abiding by written guidelines. Why would Rob engage in a pointless smear campaign against another editor? There is no record of him doing so either at [[Conservapedia]] or at [[RationalWiki]]. In the smear campaign against Rob, User:Conservative evidently invented it to save himself from the embarrassment of what others who knew him well, and interacted him regularly, thought of his behavior.

The criticism ultimately has to be laid at the owner of the website for not enforcing [[CP]]'s own [[civility]] guidelines against [[personal attacks]], and ignoring suggestions to allow creation of a dispute resolution process. Decisions seem to be made on a whim, suggestions ignored, and [[invective]] tolerated. The site originally founded as a [[meritocracy]] has not functioned as one ever since.

The criticism ultimately has to be laid at the owner of the website for not enforcing [[CP]]'s own [[civility]] guidelines against [[personal attacks]], and ignoring suggestions to allow creation of a dispute resolution process. Decisions seem to be made on a whim, suggestions ignored, and [[invective]] tolerated. The site originally founded as a [[meritocracy]] has not functioned as one ever since.