Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,693
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: − +
→Los Angeles Times reporting that RationalWikians vandalize Conservapedia: typo
According to an article published in the ''Los Angeles Times'' in 2007, RationalWiki members "by their own admission" vandalize Conservapedia. So early on, RationalWiki had a branding problem.<ref>[Simon, Stephanie (June 19, 2007). "[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-jun-19-na-schlafly19-story.html A conservative's answer to Wikipedia]". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on May 5, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2019.]</ref>
According to an article published in the ''Los Angeles Times'' in 2007, RationalWiki members "by their own admission" vandalize Conservapedia. So early on, RationalWiki had a branding problem.<ref>[Simon, Stephanie (June 19, 2007). "[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-jun-19-na-schlafly19-story.html A conservative's answer to Wikipedia]". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on May 5, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2019.]</ref>
In 2010 [[Conservapedia]] Admin [[User:RobSmith]] attempted to bring balance to the [[Wikipedia]] entry on [[Conservapedia]] which was created and "owned" by Rationalwiki editors. The entry contained loads of misinformation from the Stephanie Simon article, beginning with the false information given to Simon about the founders and owners of Rationalwiki. The Conservapedia discussion page on Wikipedia was also used to recruit [[vandal]]s and organize vandal attacks om Conservapedia. All this, of course, was in violation of Wikipedia's own policies.
In 2010 [[Conservapedia]] Admin [[User:RobSmith]] attempted to bring balance to the [[Wikipedia]] entry on [[Conservapedia]] which was created and "owned" by Rationalwiki editors. The entry contained loads of misinformation from the Stephanie Simon article, beginning with the false information given to Simon about the founders and owners of Rationalwiki. The Conservapedia discussion page on Wikipedia was also used to recruit [[vandal]]s and organize vandal attacks on Conservapedia. All this, of course, was in violation of Wikipedia's own policies.
=== Google data indicating that RationalWiki has a branding problem and RationalWikian commentary on this issue ===
=== Google data indicating that RationalWiki has a branding problem and RationalWikian commentary on this issue ===