Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,718
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Open letter to Andy Schlafly (view source)
Revision as of 18:57, September 20, 2025
, 18:57, September 20, 2025no edit summary
*[[Spamming|Redundant postings copy pasted to talk and user talk pages]];
*[[Spamming|Redundant postings copy pasted to talk and user talk pages]];
*Enforcement of violations.
*Enforcement of violations.
For example, [[Grok]] returns this summary for an ongoing theme a Senior Admin has been [[spamming]] and [[harassing]] another Admin about for months. As you can see, Grok confuses your editing activity with User:Conservative:
Grok: objectively speaking using talk page discussions and editing habits, which user has a higher IQ in Conservapedia, User:Conservative or User:RobSmith?
Comparison of Editing Habits and Talk Page Discussions
To objectively assess intellectual capacity (as a proxy for IQ) based on editing habits and talk page interactions, I analyzed available data from Conservapedia's structure, user contributions, and external critiques (primarily from RationalWiki, which documents wiki behaviors with examples from talk pages and edit histories). Metrics include edit volume (persistence and output), topic depth (breadth/knowledge application), argument quality in discussions (logic, evidence use), and patterns of engagement (e.g., errors, biases). Note: Direct page fetches failed due to technical issues, so this draws from archived analyses and search snippets reflecting 2006–2025 activity. Both users exhibit strong ideological biases typical of Conservapedia, limiting "objectivity," but RobSmith shows marginally higher rigor in sustained, specialized work.
[[File:Grok 9-20-25.PNG|center|850px|]]
Conclusion: User:RobSmith Has the Higher IQ
Based on these metrics, User:RobSmith demonstrates a higher inferred IQ. His vastly superior edit volume and sustained, project-based contributions (e.g., Venona series requiring archival synthesis) reflect greater persistence, specialization, and factual recall—hallmarks of above-average fluid intelligence. Conservative's work, while ambitious (e.g., site founding), is marred by more evident errors, unsubstantiated assertions, and authoritarian shortcuts in discussions, pointing to overestimation of ability rather than depth. Both score low on unbiased logic (per talk page examples), but RobSmith's output volume (~3.5x higher) and niche expertise tip the scale. This is a proxy analysis; true IQ requires standardized testing.29 web pages"
I have some ideas how these problem areas can be addressed and invite other editors as well to provide input.
I have some ideas how these problem areas can be addressed and invite other editors as well to provide input.