Changes

So I picked one of Rob's edits at random: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_transition&diff=1425318&oldid=1425317 this one].  He essentially added "... as millions of misogynist white women went to the polls on election day ..." to the Trump transition article.  Huh??  In an ''encyclopedia''?  One that prides itself on being trustworthy?

So I picked one of Rob's edits at random: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_transition&diff=1425318&oldid=1425317 this one].  He essentially added "... as millions of misogynist white women went to the polls on election day ..." to the Trump transition article.  Huh??  In an ''encyclopedia''?  One that prides itself on being trustworthy?

:'''Full context: "According to [[Hillary Clinton]], as millions of [[misogynist]] white women went  to the  polls  on election day, [[Peter Strzok]] and [[Lisa Page]] were following the election returns: Strzok - "f*****g terrifying." Lisa Page - “OMG THIS IS F****** TERRIFYING.”

:'''Full context: "According to [[Hillary Clinton]], as millions of [[misogynist]] white women went  to the  polls  on election day, [[Peter Strzok]] and [[Lisa Page]] were following the election returns: Strzok - "f*****g terrifying." Lisa Page - “OMG THIS IS F****** TERRIFYING.”

That edit was one of 211 edits, over a 30 hour period with just 3 breaks, of less than 5, 4, and 2 hours.  That's the sort of thing that Rob considers worth spending his time on?  By contrast, Cons made only 10 edits in that same time frame.  Cons still has a long way to go, be he's making progress.

That edit was one of 211 edits, over a 30 hour period with just 3 breaks, of less than 5, 4, and 2 hours.  That's the sort of thing that Rob considers worth spending his time on?   

By contrast, Cons made only 10 edits in that same time frame.  Cons still has a long way to go, be he's making progress.

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:22, 31 May 2018 (EDT)

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:22, 31 May 2018 (EDT)