| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | '''Christian apologetics''' is the defense of the [[Christianity|Christian]] [[faith]] through [[logic]]/evidence based arguments. The word [[apologetics]] comes from the [[Greek]] word apologia (from Greek ἀπολογία), which means "speaking in defense." Christian [[Witnessing|witness]] to [[Jesus Christ]] in an informal spontaneous setting, most often in conversation, is an oral form of Christian apologetics. ''See'' [[First Epistle of Peter (Translated)#3:15|1 Peter 3:15]]. Several compelling points are: | | '''Christian apologetics''' is the defense of the [[Christianity|Christian]] [[faith]] through [[logic]]/evidence based arguments. The word [[apologetics]] comes from the [[Greek]] word apologia (from Greek ἀπολογία), which means "speaking in defense." Christian [[Witnessing|witness]] to [[Jesus Christ]] in an informal spontaneous setting, most often in conversation, is an oral form of Christian apologetics. ''See'' [[First Epistle of Peter (Translated)#3:15|1 Peter 3:15]]. Several compelling points are: |
| | *the four [[Gospel]]s were written by ethnic rivals -- a Jew, a Gentile, a Greek, and probably a Samaritan -- and yet fully corroborate each other's accounts; | | *the four [[Gospel]]s were written by ethnic rivals -- a Jew, a Gentile, a Greek, and probably a Samaritan -- and yet fully corroborate each other's accounts; |
| − | *the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is a spectacular literary masterpiece beyond the local ability of anyone other than [[Jesus]] as the [[Son of God]]; and | + | *the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is a spectacular literary masterpiece beyond the local ability of anyone other than [[Jesus]] as the [[Son of God]]; |
| − | *the [[Shroud of Turin]] confirms an intense flash of light in the [[Resurrection]]. | + | *the [[Bible]], by far the best-selling book, rings true and is helpful to people far more than any alternative; and |
| | + | *the [[Shroud of Turin]], impossible to duplicate, confirms an intense flash of light in the [[Resurrection]]. |
| | | | |
| | Effective apologetics can be based in politics, [[faith]], reason, linguistics, science, experience, and/or history. [[Atheist]]ic societies or values are notoriously inhumane and hostile to [[free speech|freedom of speech]]. | | Effective apologetics can be based in politics, [[faith]], reason, linguistics, science, experience, and/or history. [[Atheist]]ic societies or values are notoriously inhumane and hostile to [[free speech|freedom of speech]]. |