Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,824
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 218:
Line 218: − +
Talk:Mystery: Was John a Samaritan (view source)
Revision as of 08:52, October 12, 2025
, 08:52, October 12, 2025→The essay assembles a bunch of Lilliputian-size poor arguments and some invalid arguments while ignoring the Gulliver-sized arguments in terms of their strength
Omissions (e.g., no parables, fewer Old Testament quotes) align with John's unique narrative focus, not Samaritan Pentateuch-only views.
Omissions (e.g., no parables, fewer Old Testament quotes) align with John's unique narrative focus, not Samaritan Pentateuch-only views.
These arguments often rely on absence of evidence or cherry-picked details, lacking empirical support from archaeology, textual criticism, or patristic sources, making them collectively weak against the "Gulliver" scale of established evidence for John's Jewish identity."
These arguments often rely on absence of evidence or cherry-picked details, lacking empirical support from archaeology, textual criticism, or patristic sources, making them collectively weak against the "Gulliver" scale of established evidence for John's Jewish identity."[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_4512579b-6e87-4d02-881c-61dca6636b19] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:52, October 12, 2025 (EDT)