Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,824
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 209:
Line 209: − +
Talk:Mystery: Was John a Samaritan (view source)
Revision as of 09:08, October 12, 2025
, 09:08, October 12, 2025→The essay assembles a bunch of Lilliputian-size poor arguments and some invalid arguments while ignoring the Gulliver-sized arguments that the Apostle John was Jewish in terms of their strength
:::::'''Strength Reasoning:''' The cultural and occupational context strongly supports Jewish identity, but the absence of direct references to John’s family observing specific Jewish rituals slightly lowers the score."[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_7093ed62-0eb9-480a-9474-1f518aa9b7de]
:::::'''Strength Reasoning:''' The cultural and occupational context strongly supports Jewish identity, but the absence of direct references to John’s family observing specific Jewish rituals slightly lowers the score."[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_7093ed62-0eb9-480a-9474-1f518aa9b7de]
== The essay assembles a bunch of Lilliputian-size poor arguments and some invalid arguments while ignoring the Gulliver-sized arguments that the Apostle John was Jewish in terms of their strength ==
== The essay assembles a bunch of Lilliputian-size poor arguments and some invalid arguments while ignoring the Gulliver-sized scale of established evidence that the Apostle John was Jewish ==
"The essay's 34 points are largely Lilliputian in nature: speculative, circumstantial, or based on misinterpretations that strain to fit the thesis without rigorous evidence. For instance:
"The essay's 34 points are largely Lilliputian in nature: speculative, circumstantial, or based on misinterpretations that strain to fit the thesis without rigorous evidence. For instance: