nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + + + + + + +
Britinme's edits
Are humans not vertebrates that produce milk for their young with hair, specialized teeth, three bones in the ear, warm blooded, and have a placenta when developing? This is what defines a mammal. If any of those are wrong, then we are not mammals. Being a mammal is a scientific definition and classification - not an idealogical one. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 22:54, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Are humans not vertebrates that produce milk for their young with hair, specialized teeth, three bones in the ear, warm blooded, and have a placenta when developing? This is what defines a mammal. If any of those are wrong, then we are not mammals. Being a mammal is a scientific definition and classification - not an idealogical one. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 22:54, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
== Britinme's edits ==
I've changed Britinme's edits, and I'm here explaining why.
* I've removed the bit about the human brain being larger than the chimpanzee's, because it has what relevance? His text seemed to imply that's why it has extra capabilities, but elephant and whale brains are bigger, so it the point is lost. The text already said that humans had the capability of language, so even that bit wasn't needed.
* I've change the bit about the larynx, as it assumed evolution to be true. I've used the word "design", but even evolutionists such as Dawkins have used that word, so it doesn't necessarily imply a designer.
* Other bits I've deleted because they duplicated material already there, or I've explained in edit comments.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:09, 3 July 2007 (EDT)