Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 136:
Line 136: + +
→Could we unprotect now-+ a comment
The criticism of Theistic evolution in this context is not coming from people because they are "evolutionists" but generally due to atheism or other reasons. Also, since we seem to have most users agreeing on a draft, can we take out the protection? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:31, 8 March 2007 (EST)
The criticism of Theistic evolution in this context is not coming from people because they are "evolutionists" but generally due to atheism or other reasons. Also, since we seem to have most users agreeing on a draft, can we take out the protection? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:31, 8 March 2007 (EST)
I am unprotecting now. Again, please do not add the Pope comment yet. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:35, 8 March 2007 (EST)conservative
== Please do not add the Pope endorsing theistic evolution until Admin Aschlafly decides if he wants to weigh in since he said he studied this matter in depth ==
== Please do not add the Pope endorsing theistic evolution until Admin Aschlafly decides if he wants to weigh in since he said he studied this matter in depth ==
Please do not add the Pope endorsing theistic evolution until Admin Aschlafly decides if he wants to weigh in since he said he studied this matter in depth. In the absence of Admin Aschlafly weighing in within a reasonable time, further corroboration should be done. I don't want Conservapedia overly dependent on Mr. Aschlafly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:33, 8 March 2007 (EST)conservative
Please do not add the Pope endorsing theistic evolution until Admin Aschlafly decides if he wants to weigh in since he said he studied this matter in depth. In the absence of Admin Aschlafly weighing in within a reasonable time, further corroboration should be done. I don't want Conservapedia overly dependent on Mr. Aschlafly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:33, 8 March 2007 (EST)conservative