Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
split the article in two?
As I become more comfortable with LaTeX, i'll be adding many more formuals and pictures. Right now, the article probably doesn't read well because math necessitates a lot of equations. I intend to fix thsi up and also cover many more topics in vectors, extending to calculus of vector-valued functions, assuming I'm not tossed off the wiki for standing up for the truth. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 13:36, 28 June 2007 (EDT)
As I become more comfortable with LaTeX, i'll be adding many more formuals and pictures. Right now, the article probably doesn't read well because math necessitates a lot of equations. I intend to fix thsi up and also cover many more topics in vectors, extending to calculus of vector-valued functions, assuming I'm not tossed off the wiki for standing up for the truth. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 13:36, 28 June 2007 (EDT)
:Needs disambiguation - or splitting into separate articles. I suggest a bio/math split. Have the two kinds of biological vectors in one article; the math and physics vectors in another. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:58, 3 July 2007 (EDT)