Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,741
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,050:
Line 1,050: + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 06:20, November 6, 2025
, 06:20, November 6, 2025no edit summary
|''[[WaPo]]'' reports Prigozhin in secret contact with Ukrainian authorities.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/14/prigozhin-wagner-ukraine-leaked-documents/</ref>
|''[[WaPo]]'' reports Prigozhin in secret contact with Ukrainian authorities.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/14/prigozhin-wagner-ukraine-leaked-documents/</ref>
|May 14, 2023
|May 14, 2023
|-
|May 25, 2023
|Conservapedia argues that "[[Western alliance|Western]] [[NATO]] leaders and [[population]]s were misled by groupthink and greed into believing fourth-generation warfare could be won through [[propaganda]] and [[misinformation]] alone"<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/NATO_war_in_Ukraine</ref>
|"We'll back [[Ukraine]] for as long as it takes."
|[[International relations]] expert [[John Mearsheimer]] said, "The liberal west forgot this. It
convinced itself that [[economic sanctions]], [[social media]] [[narrative]]s, and international condemnation could substitute for hard power....Yet, unlike [[the West]], which has built its [[strategy]] almost entirely on [[narrative]] supremacy, [[Russia]]'s invitation [to visit the battlefield] was a paradoxical act of dominance. ...The [[Kremlin]] was saying in effect, "Look
for yourselves. The [[fact]]s, speak louder than your [[propaganda]]."<ref>https://youtu.be/NjbQPgGRIHY</ref>
|November 5, 2025
|-
|-
|May 28, 2023
|May 28, 2023