Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
582 bytes added ,  01:46, July 4, 2007
m
Reverted edits by Scorpio (Talk); changed back to last version by Bohdan
Line 472: Line 472:     
:::::[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:26, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:26, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Dear Mr. Schlafly, I have left this message on Andrew's Talk page as well and felt that I should repeat my message with you as well. I appreciate your support of my work on the McCarthy page but I'm alarmed to find that [[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] is not a fan of my contributions nor of those of RobS. He stated that, '''"I am a bit uneasy with just two editors 'bragaining' their way through what is supposed to be an encyclopedia article, not a personal opinion piece."'''
 +
 +
It distresses me to be told that the work that I spent countless hours contributing and carefully footnoting is being called essentially garbage. I have stated that I will cease contributing any further and will revert all my work on the McCarthy article if that perception of my contributions remains unchanged. I don't want to be a contributor of worthless information. That was never my intent.
 +
 +
As for the time I have spent here, I thank you for the opportunity to contribute. Please let me know if I can help in any other article. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:14, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
    
P.S. You and Andrew are great guys and have a great mom. I've been a fan of Mrs. Schlafly since I came across her work in the mid-1980's. God bless. :)
 
P.S. You and Andrew are great guys and have a great mom. I've been a fan of Mrs. Schlafly since I came across her work in the mid-1980's. God bless. :)
Line 523: Line 529:  
[[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]], I was wondeering if you had any thoughts on how we can get a higher listing on Conservapedia articles on various search engines, including Google. I just did a new search today and found that the [[Joseph McCarthy]] is now placing as number 25, which is an improvement. But I think the article should place higher and I'm wondering what we can do to improve the results. Please let me know if you have any ideas on this matter. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:35, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 
[[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]], I was wondeering if you had any thoughts on how we can get a higher listing on Conservapedia articles on various search engines, including Google. I just did a new search today and found that the [[Joseph McCarthy]] is now placing as number 25, which is an improvement. But I think the article should place higher and I'm wondering what we can do to improve the results. Please let me know if you have any ideas on this matter. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:35, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:I hope I'm not out of line in posting here, but have you submitted to the google webmaster program (google.com/webmasters/) They have a sitemap program which may help Conservapedia to get indexed quicker. Other than that, its all about people linking to Conservapedia, especially those with higher page ranks. Just something I thought I'd mention, maybe you already have done this. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 11:55, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:I hope I'm not out of line in posting here, but have you submitted to the google webmaster program (google.com/webmasters/) They have a sitemap program which may help Conservapedia to get indexed quicker. Other than that, its all about people linking to Conservapedia, especially those with higher page ranks. Just something I thought I'd mention, maybe you already have done this. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 11:55, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
−
::MsKreuz, thanks for your comments. That is well said. When I once had a website to help people fight scams, I used a great program that would automatically submit to hundreds of search engines based on keywords my website. It worked so well that my website would usually rank in the top four on Google. Maybe there's a program that can help in this situation as well. But perhaps [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] might know of a better way to get this done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:30, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
      
== Axiom of Choice ==
 
== Axiom of Choice ==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,592

edits

Navigation menu