Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,518
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − − ==Controversy== − The general claims against this theory include: − *Fossils and geological objects are declared much older than the 10,000 years based on "[[carbon dating]]" − *Assuming constancy, geological records indicate landforms such as mountains and rivers formed over a much longer period of time than 10,000 years − *Human artifacts such as the Lascaux cave paintings and France seem to surpass this age barrier by up to twenty thousand years
→Controversy
The vast majority of Christians throughout history have believed in the factuality of a young earth, based on the genealogies of Scripture.<ref>Turpin, Simon (December 29, 2016). [https://answersingenesis.org/reviews/articles/response-age-earth-plea-geo-chronological-non-dogmatism/ A Response to “The Age of the Earth: A Plea for Geo-Chronological Non-Dogmatism”]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved December 31, 2016.</ref>
The vast majority of Christians throughout history have believed in the factuality of a young earth, based on the genealogies of Scripture.<ref>Turpin, Simon (December 29, 2016). [https://answersingenesis.org/reviews/articles/response-age-earth-plea-geo-chronological-non-dogmatism/ A Response to “The Age of the Earth: A Plea for Geo-Chronological Non-Dogmatism”]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved December 31, 2016.</ref>
==See also==
==See also==