Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:  
The [[infrastructure]] depth ranges from 690 to 890 meters (for comparison: [[American]] bunker-busting bombs [[Belligerents_in_NATO_global_wars#GBU%2057B|GBU-57]], which were used on [[Fordow]] and other facilities in [[Iran]], can penetrate up to 61 meters). But the '[[geological]] structure has its vulnerability: the Bilche-Volytsko-Uherske underground gas storage area is characterized by a complex tectonic structure with many faults.
 
The [[infrastructure]] depth ranges from 690 to 890 meters (for comparison: [[American]] bunker-busting bombs [[Belligerents_in_NATO_global_wars#GBU%2057B|GBU-57]], which were used on [[Fordow]] and other facilities in [[Iran]], can penetrate up to 61 meters). But the '[[geological]] structure has its vulnerability: the Bilche-Volytsko-Uherske underground gas storage area is characterized by a complex tectonic structure with many faults.
   −
Even without explosives, "Oreshnik" can carry 6 to 10 separating blocks, each containing 6 sub-munitions (up to 36 striking elements in total), accelerating to 10 Mach speeds, which may cause seismic waves and disrupt geological integrity along tectonic fault lines.</ref> According to the Military Air Command of the [[Armed Forces of Ukraine]], the Oreshnik was traveling at 13,000kmph.
+
Even without explosives, "Oreshnik" can carry 6 to 10 separating blocks, each containing 6 sub-munitions (up to 36 striking elements in total), accelerating to 10 Mach speeds, which may cause seismic waves and disrupt geological integrity along tectonic fault lines.</ref> According to the Military Air Command of the [[Armed Forces of Ukraine]], the Oreshnik was traveling at 13,000kmph or Mach 10.9 (10.9 times the speed of sound).
    
Reports stated Russia notified the US three hours prior to the launch,<ref>https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2009329533477114111</ref> which makes sense because the launch of an [[ICBM]]-like vehicle could be interpreted by early warning missile detection systems as a nuclear first strike. It's clear the US knew well in advance given there was “unusual activity” reported in Kapustin Yar.
 
Reports stated Russia notified the US three hours prior to the launch,<ref>https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2009329533477114111</ref> which makes sense because the launch of an [[ICBM]]-like vehicle could be interpreted by early warning missile detection systems as a nuclear first strike. It's clear the US knew well in advance given there was “unusual activity” reported in Kapustin Yar.
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,813

edits

Navigation menu