| | '''Delete''' Clearly, the (round rubber things that vehicles use and '''trigger the spam filter''' hahahahah) grind slowly, and, as this article shows, none-too-finely. I'm so glad it hasn't been deleted yet, though. It warms my heart with glee, it really does. But I still have to vote for 'delete', because really, I like a lot of non-whackjob conservatives. [[User:MyaR|MyaR]] 23:15, 7 June 2007 (EDT) | | '''Delete''' Clearly, the (round rubber things that vehicles use and '''trigger the spam filter''' hahahahah) grind slowly, and, as this article shows, none-too-finely. I'm so glad it hasn't been deleted yet, though. It warms my heart with glee, it really does. But I still have to vote for 'delete', because really, I like a lot of non-whackjob conservatives. [[User:MyaR|MyaR]] 23:15, 7 June 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | '''Delete''' I had attempted to write something intelligent here (exobiology), which unfortunately was wiped out without even a trace in history by "Conservative" sysop, who then locked it. If Conservapedia wishes to have this article contain some number of paragraphs representing the christian fundamentalist POV, that's great. But to assert a fundamentalist approach to this issue and refuse any other view a hearing, is to exclude the vast majority of American christians and American conservatives, and gives a false picture of conservatism to those who might be taken in. I don't mean to be insulting, but even if the Bible is literally true in every single word, it doesn't define whether or not something is a science or a pseudoscience, both of those being concepts invented long after John wrote the last word of Revelations. |