Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 101: Line 101:  
Fallacy TypeDescription
 
Fallacy TypeDescription
   −
Example from ArticleStraw Man
+
Example from Article
 +
 
 +
Straw Man
    
Misrepresenting an opposing view to make it easier to attack, often by exaggerating or oversimplifying it.
 
Misrepresenting an opposing view to make it easier to attack, often by exaggerating or oversimplifying it.
Line 121: Line 123:  
Attacking or biasing against a group/person through derogatory terms rather than engaging arguments.Phrases like "Palestinian-apologetic Biden administration" and "racist terror ('pay-for-slay')" dismiss policy critiques without evidence, using inflammatory rhetoric to imply moral corruption. Similarly, unsubstantiated claims of "rise in gay bashing by Muslim migrants" (citing Rebel Media, a partisan source) stereotype an entire group without addressing socioeconomic factors or counter-data on declining hate crimes in Europe.
 
Attacking or biasing against a group/person through derogatory terms rather than engaging arguments.Phrases like "Palestinian-apologetic Biden administration" and "racist terror ('pay-for-slay')" dismiss policy critiques without evidence, using inflammatory rhetoric to imply moral corruption. Similarly, unsubstantiated claims of "rise in gay bashing by Muslim migrants" (citing Rebel Media, a partisan source) stereotype an entire group without addressing socioeconomic factors or counter-data on declining hate crimes in Europe.
   −
Appeal to Authority (Selective)Relying on authorities whose expertise is tangential or biased toward the conclusion.Quotes from conservative Christian sources (e.g., Got Questions Ministries, The Master's Seminary) on theology, or pathologists like Bernard Knight on "most violent homicides...among male homosexuals," are presented as definitive. These authorities align with Conservapedia's worldview but aren't balanced against opposing experts (e.g., sociologists on hate crime epidemiology), creating an echo chamber effect."
+
Appeal to Authority (Selective)
 +
 
 +
Relying on authorities whose expertise is tangential or biased toward the conclusion.Quotes from conservative Christian sources (e.g., Got Questions Ministries, The Master's Seminary) on theology, or pathologists like Bernard Knight on "most violent homicides...among male homosexuals," are presented as definitive. These authorities align with Conservapedia's worldview but aren't balanced against opposing experts (e.g., sociologists on hate crime epidemiology), creating an echo chamber effect."
    
Comment: Now that [[Grok]] has clarified [[User:Conservative]]'s understanding of [[conservativism]] to equate with [[antisemitism]], it all makes sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:18, October 12, 2025 (EDT)
 
Comment: Now that [[Grok]] has clarified [[User:Conservative]]'s understanding of [[conservativism]] to equate with [[antisemitism]], it all makes sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:18, October 12, 2025 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,396

edits

Navigation menu