| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | #[[Greek language|ancient Greek]] was underdeveloped as to certain concepts, such as [[infinity|infinite]] and [[pro-life]], and translation of the [[New Testament]] is more enlightening, beneficial, and complete when it utilizes [[Best New Conservative Words|modern conservative terminology]]; | | #[[Greek language|ancient Greek]] was underdeveloped as to certain concepts, such as [[infinity|infinite]] and [[pro-life]], and translation of the [[New Testament]] is more enlightening, beneficial, and complete when it utilizes [[Best New Conservative Words|modern conservative terminology]]; |
| | #the [[Gospel of John]] is very powerful in combatting [[anxiety]] with its frequent emphasis on [[eternal life|eternal]]/[[infinite]] life, and yet modern academic translators downplay and dilute this most-important [[Gospel]]; | | #the [[Gospel of John]] is very powerful in combatting [[anxiety]] with its frequent emphasis on [[eternal life|eternal]]/[[infinite]] life, and yet modern academic translators downplay and dilute this most-important [[Gospel]]; |
| − | #powerful political terminology like "lobbying" can enhance the understanding of what effective "prayer"(500 times in Bible) means, as in "lobbying [[God]]" to intervene for good rather than merely holding a [[liberal]] moment of silence as [[secularization]] connotes for "prayer"; | + | #powerful political terminology like "lobbying" can enhance the understanding of what effective "prayer" (500 times in Bible) means, as in "lobbying [[God]]" to intervene for good rather than merely holding a [[liberal]] moment of silence as [[secularization]] connotes for "prayer"; |
| | #most modern translations are entirely by linguist professors without input by those having mathematical, scientific, writing, artistic, or poetic skills, causing a more one-dimensional and antiquated rendition than it should be; | | #most modern translations are entirely by linguist professors without input by those having mathematical, scientific, writing, artistic, or poetic skills, causing a more one-dimensional and antiquated rendition than it should be; |
| | #the original endings of the Gospels of [[Mark ending|Mark]] and [[John ending|John]] are inspiring, spectacular finales, as when women are startled at the [[Tomb]] by a powerful young man and react with ecstasy,<ref>''See'' [[Mark ending]] and the first half of {{bibleref|Mark|16|8}} .</ref> but [[liberal]] professors refuse to clean off the later-added conclusions that obscure like cheap overpaint of a masterpiece; | | #the original endings of the Gospels of [[Mark ending|Mark]] and [[John ending|John]] are inspiring, spectacular finales, as when women are startled at the [[Tomb]] by a powerful young man and react with ecstasy,<ref>''See'' [[Mark ending]] and the first half of {{bibleref|Mark|16|8}} .</ref> but [[liberal]] professors refuse to clean off the later-added conclusions that obscure like cheap overpaint of a masterpiece; |