Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 92: Line 92:  
== Wait, what? ==
 
== Wait, what? ==
   −
[[User:Phist|Phist]]
+
Are you honestly asking how a conservative encyclopedia can avoid a conserative bias? Is that not the very definition of conservapedia? Wikipedia, but with a conservative bias? If that seems like an offensive point to you, ask yourself, if this site ''didn't'' have a conservative bias, how would it be different from wikipedia? --[[User:Phist|Phist]]
Are you honestly asking how a conservative encyclopedia can avoid a conserative bias? Is that not the very definition of conservapedia? Wikipedia, but with a conservative bias? If that seems like an offensive point to you, ask yourself, if this site ''didn't'' have a conservative bias, how would it be different from wikipedia?  
+
 
 +
:It could just ''not have a liberal bias''. --[[User:Monotreme|Monotreme]] 08:46, 9 March 2007 (EST)
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
*[[Rhetorical question]]
 
*[[Rhetorical question]]
121

edits

Navigation menu