| Line 92: |
Line 92: |
| | == Wait, what? == | | == Wait, what? == |
| | | | |
| − | [[User:Phist|Phist]]
| + | Are you honestly asking how a conservative encyclopedia can avoid a conserative bias? Is that not the very definition of conservapedia? Wikipedia, but with a conservative bias? If that seems like an offensive point to you, ask yourself, if this site ''didn't'' have a conservative bias, how would it be different from wikipedia? --[[User:Phist|Phist]] |
| − | Are you honestly asking how a conservative encyclopedia can avoid a conserative bias? Is that not the very definition of conservapedia? Wikipedia, but with a conservative bias? If that seems like an offensive point to you, ask yourself, if this site ''didn't'' have a conservative bias, how would it be different from wikipedia? | + | |
| | + | :It could just ''not have a liberal bias''. --[[User:Monotreme|Monotreme]] 08:46, 9 March 2007 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | ==See also== | | ==See also== |
| | *[[Rhetorical question]] | | *[[Rhetorical question]] |