Changes

:I also find it strange that you even make the suggestion, since the "About Conservapedia" section of this website already proclaims Wikipedia to be "6 times more Liberal than the American Public". [[User:Simple|Simple]]

:I also find it strange that you even make the suggestion, since the "About Conservapedia" section of this website already proclaims Wikipedia to be "6 times more Liberal than the American Public". [[User:Simple|Simple]]

  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.  GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.

1. Religious texts aren't propaganda.

2. Go to the bottom of the web page and read "About Conservapedia".

3. Read previous posts and see where that conflicts with "About Conservapedia" statement.

4. Respond in an evil, godless, liberal manner.

Happy Earth day!--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 14:56, 22 April 2007 (EDT)

 

: I guess I am puzzled for referring to a response with quotes from Matthew as Evil and Godless.  I guess Matthew is someone else then and in his writing and in the Bible I saw, it is something very different.  I appreciate your pointing them out to me.  From now on, I will consider everything Matthew has written to be evil.  Unless, you can correct me since you know everything.  [[User:Seekcommon]]

 

 

Look what they came up with now: according to the front page Mr. Schlaffy can apparently predict the future: he already knows who's going to win the second round of the French Presidential elections.

 

Seekcommon, I'm right there with you.

 

 

::Since you know everything? Last time I heard that was from a 10 year old girl; and she was right. Dude, he only won the first round, get a grip! Also, thanks for following number four. Please, carry on.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 08:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

::: I do agree with you on the issue of age, we do lose a lot as we age, I know, I have an intelligent one myself that I learn from.  But I am curious, point 4, you talk about responding in an "Evil, Godless, Liberal" manner ... Does that also refer to my quoting Matthew? [[User:Seekcommon]]

 

Of course I know he only won the first round, but the front page says he won the elections altogether.

 

: Then again, a story from the Left.  When Daniel Ortega was defeated the first time in Nicaragua, Peter Jennings that this incredible look on his face and kept wondering how he lost when "polls" indicated that he should have won.  It is as if, Jennings so wanted Ortega to win that he could not accept the decision.  Mainstream media were stunned that a left winger lost an election.  So, stuff happens. [[User:Seekcommon]]