nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 547:
Line 547: +
→Isaac Newton: Thank Hsmom, but that still leaves much unexplained.
What was wrong with [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&diff=prev&oldid=217697 this edit] please that caused you to revert it without comment? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:48, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
What was wrong with [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Isaac_Newton&diff=prev&oldid=217697 this edit] please that caused you to revert it without comment? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:48, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
:See the previous conversation on the topic here - [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Isaac_Newton#To_.22Sir.22_or_not_to_.22Sir.22] --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:46, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
:See the previous conversation on the topic here - [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Isaac_Newton#To_.22Sir.22_or_not_to_.22Sir.22] --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:46, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
::Thanks for that. I didn't think to look there (and an edit comment pointing me there would have been proper). That doesn't explain the reversion of the bolding (bolding the article title in its first reference is standard practice), nor the lack of an edit comment. (Nor the lack of a reply from RSchlafly here.) And the argument you point to is out of date in that Conservapedia has moved away from being so exclusively American. In other words, although I now see that it was discussed, I still think it should be there. But I'll make that point on that page. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:03, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
==[[User:Scorpio]]==
==[[User:Scorpio]]==