Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
449 bytes added ,  15:29, March 9, 2007
Foreign Treaties are liberal?
Line 40: Line 40:  
:The "reversion" key does not allow explanation.  Let me explain here.  Your additions were not factual enough.  Saying liberals want "reform" is meaningless.  You said they want more wealth for the poor.  No one is against that either.  The point of this entry is to describe how liberals distinguish themselves in their beliefs.  No one favors harming the environment either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:36, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 
:The "reversion" key does not allow explanation.  Let me explain here.  Your additions were not factual enough.  Saying liberals want "reform" is meaningless.  You said they want more wealth for the poor.  No one is against that either.  The point of this entry is to describe how liberals distinguish themselves in their beliefs.  No one favors harming the environment either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:36, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 
:: The "reform" comes from "American Heritage Dictionary". Of course no one is against more wealth for the poor. But the liberals are tending to take a lot of money from the rich to achieve that. And of course no one favours harming the environment. But most just do not really care. Look who is driving the hybrids. Most of them are liberals. No American but Japanese cars. --[[User:Itsjustme|Itsjustme]] 21:41, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 
:: The "reform" comes from "American Heritage Dictionary". Of course no one is against more wealth for the poor. But the liberals are tending to take a lot of money from the rich to achieve that. And of course no one favours harming the environment. But most just do not really care. Look who is driving the hybrids. Most of them are liberals. No American but Japanese cars. --[[User:Itsjustme|Itsjustme]] 21:41, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
== Foreign Treaties are liberal? ==
 +
 +
First off, treaties by their nature are foreign since we sign them with other countries. So that is redundant.  Secondly, many conservative presidents have signed treaties, so how can they be a "liberal" goal. Thirdly, conservative president have signed disarmament treaties, or has everyone forgotten Reagan and Gorbachev signing the INF Treaty in 1988? --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 10:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)
433

edits

Navigation menu