| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{ConservativeBible}} | | {{ConservativeBible}} |
| | The '''Conservative Bible Project''' renders [[God]]'s word without [[liberal denial]]. A ''Colbert Report'' interview featured this project.<ref>[http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly The Colbert Report Videos: Andy Schlafly], ColbertNation.com, December 8, 2009.</ref> Achievements include these 50 insights: | | The '''Conservative Bible Project''' renders [[God]]'s word without [[liberal denial]]. A ''Colbert Report'' interview featured this project.<ref>[http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly The Colbert Report Videos: Andy Schlafly], ColbertNation.com, December 8, 2009.</ref> Achievements include these 50 insights: |
| | + | #the Gospels of [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] and [[Gospel of John|John]], and the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], were written contemporaneously with [[Jesus]], as confirmed in many ways for each,<ref>''See'' [[Date of Hebrews|16 confirmations that the Date of Hebrews was just after the [[Resurrection]]]], [[Date of John|10 reasons that the Gospel of John was contemporaneous with Jesus]], and [[date of the Gospel of Mark|14 proofs that the Gospel of Mark was contemporaneous also]]</ref> yet [[liberal denial]] falsely denies this and causes [[AI]] to mislead everyone with late false dates; |
| | #the [[Gospel of John]] is breathtakingly powerful in its logic -- "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us"<ref>{{bibleref|John|1|14}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> -- which can overcome [[anxiety]] with its emphasis on [[eternal life]], and yet [[liberal]]s downplay, dilute and hide this; | | #the [[Gospel of John]] is breathtakingly powerful in its logic -- "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us"<ref>{{bibleref|John|1|14}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> -- which can overcome [[anxiety]] with its emphasis on [[eternal life]], and yet [[liberal]]s downplay, dilute and hide this; |
| | #the four [[Gospels]] were written by ethnic rivals: a [[Jew]], a [[Gentile]], a [[Greek]], and [[Mystery: Was John a Samaritan|probably a Samaritan]] ([[John]]), which proves their authenticity because they verified each other's accounts despite their underlying conflict; | | #the four [[Gospels]] were written by ethnic rivals: a [[Jew]], a [[Gentile]], a [[Greek]], and [[Mystery: Was John a Samaritan|probably a Samaritan]] ([[John]]), which proves their authenticity because they verified each other's accounts despite their underlying conflict; |
| Line 48: |
Line 49: |
| | #professors and secular encyclopedias often refer to a book by its ordering in most [[Bible]]s, such as "the fourth Gospel," but its ordering is arbitrary and not inspired, and thus a distraction in understanding and benefiting from the Bible; | | #professors and secular encyclopedias often refer to a book by its ordering in most [[Bible]]s, such as "the fourth Gospel," but its ordering is arbitrary and not inspired, and thus a distraction in understanding and benefiting from the Bible; |
| | #John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> when a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness. | | #John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> when a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness. |
| − | #the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide;<ref>As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> | + | #the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide;<ref>As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and |
| − | #the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] was written soon after the [[Resurrection]], as confirmed in [[Date of Hebrews|16 ways]], as was the [[Gospel of John]] as confirmed in [[Date of John|10 ways]], and yet [[liberal denial]] pretends otherwise;<ref>Similarly, [[liberal]]s falsely pretend that the [[date of the Gospel of Mark]] is somehow connected with the destruction of the Second Temple.</ref> and
| |
| | #[[O’Sullivan’s First Law]]: any endeavor that is not actually [[conservative]] will inevitably be distorted and ruined by [[liberal]]s, including [[Bible]] translation by [[college]] professors. | | #[[O’Sullivan’s First Law]]: any endeavor that is not actually [[conservative]] will inevitably be distorted and ruined by [[liberal]]s, including [[Bible]] translation by [[college]] professors. |
| | | | |