Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 510: Line 510:  
Critics further noted that Euro-Med had previously promoted lies about Israel allegedly “vaporizing” Palestinians into dust.<ref>{{cite web |title=This is how @NickKristof opens his screed |url=[https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889](https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
 
Critics further noted that Euro-Med had previously promoted lies about Israel allegedly “vaporizing” Palestinians into dust.<ref>{{cite web |title=This is how @NickKristof opens his screed |url=[https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889](https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/2053828304377966889) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
   −
An article points out that Kristof omitted Euro-Med Monitor’s ties to Hamas, including accusations regarding its founder Ramy Abdu and former chairman Mazen Kahel.<ref name=altmiller>{{cite web |last=Alt Miller |first=Yvette |title=Nicholas Kristof’s Libel Against Israel |website=Aish |date=2026-05-12 |url=https://aish.com/nicholas-kristofs-libel-against-israel/}}</ref>
+
An article says that Kristof omitted Euro-Med Monitor’s ties to Hamas, including accusations regarding its founder Ramy Abdu and former chairman Mazen Kahel.<ref name=altmiller>{{cite web |last=Alt Miller |first=Yvette |title=Nicholas Kristof’s Libel Against Israel |website=Aish |date=2026-05-12 |url=https://aish.com/nicholas-kristofs-libel-against-israel/}}</ref>
    
Euro-Med's Ramy Abdu has been publicly supporting Hamas following the October 7, 2023 attacks and has been participating in efforts to influence public opinion and Wikipedia coverage regarding Israel and Hamas.<ref name=altmiller/>
 
Euro-Med's Ramy Abdu has been publicly supporting Hamas following the October 7, 2023 attacks and has been participating in efforts to influence public opinion and Wikipedia coverage regarding Israel and Hamas.<ref name=altmiller/>
Line 533: Line 533:  
A JPost editorial<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-895947 |title=When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual reports - editorial |publisher=The Jerusalem Post (Editorial) |date=May 13, 2026}}</ref>: 'When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual reports. And even Kristof himself admits that “it’s impossible to know how common sexual assaults against Palestinians are” -- though that does not stop him from going on about it for almost 4,000 words.'
 
A JPost editorial<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-895947 |title=When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual reports - editorial |publisher=The Jerusalem Post (Editorial) |date=May 13, 2026}}</ref>: 'When it comes to Oct. 7, the New York Times prefers baseless claims over actual reports. And even Kristof himself admits that “it’s impossible to know how common sexual assaults against Palestinians are” -- though that does not stop him from going on about it for almost 4,000 words.'
   −
It points out that Nicholas Kristof and The New York Times blurred the line between opinion writing and investigative journalism by publishing unverified allegations about Israeli abuses of Palestinian prisoners. The outrage  is especially promoting a claim — attributed to anonymous testimony and a report from Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor — that (tail tale) ridiculous claim, the accusation implausible and irresponsible to publish.
+
It states that Nicholas Kristof and The New York Times blurred the line between opinion writing and investigative journalism by publishing unverified allegations about Israeli abuses of Palestinian prisoners. The outrage  is especially promoting a claim — attributed to anonymous testimony and a report from Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor — that (tail tale) ridiculous claim, the accusation implausible and irresponsible to publish.
    
The piece criticizes Kristof for presenting allegations of systematic rape and sexual torture as effectively established despite admitting there is limited evidence about how widespread such abuses are.
 
The piece criticizes Kristof for presenting allegations of systematic rape and sexual torture as effectively established despite admitting there is limited evidence about how widespread such abuses are.
   −
It also points out that Kristof and the Times gave disproportionate attention to allegations against Israel while neglecting or downplaying documented sexual violence committed by Hamas during the October 7 attacks. It points to a report by the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children that the author says received insufficient coverage from the Times.
+
It also says that Kristof and the Times gave disproportionate attention to allegations against Israel while neglecting or downplaying documented sexual violence committed by Hamas during the October 7 attacks. It points to a report by the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children that the author says received insufficient coverage from the Times.
    
The report on true sexual crimes (by genocidal "[[Palestine]]" regime of course) NYT tried to avoid:  
 
The report on true sexual crimes (by genocidal "[[Palestine]]" regime of course) NYT tried to avoid:  
Line 549: Line 549:  
Critics drew parallels between the controversy and Kristof’s previous involvement with anti-trafficking activist Somaly Mam, whose abuse narratives were later challenged.<ref>{{cite web |title=In 2014, Nicholas Kristof had to write a humiliating blog post titled “When Sources May Have Lied.” |url=[https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478](https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
 
Critics drew parallels between the controversy and Kristof’s previous involvement with anti-trafficking activist Somaly Mam, whose abuse narratives were later challenged.<ref>{{cite web |title=In 2014, Nicholas Kristof had to write a humiliating blog post titled “When Sources May Have Lied.” |url=[https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478](https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
   −
Fischberger points out that Kristof had once again relied heavily on emotionally charged testimony without sufficient corroboration.<ref>{{cite web |title=In 2014, Nicholas Kristof had to write a humiliating blog post titled “When Sources May Have Lied.” |url=[https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478](https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
+
Fischberger says that Kristof had once again relied heavily on emotionally charged testimony without sufficient corroboration.<ref>{{cite web |title=In 2014, Nicholas Kristof had to write a humiliating blog post titled “When Sources May Have Lied.” |url=[https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478](https://x.com/EFischberger/status/2053964732944556478) |website=X (Twitter) |author=Eitan Fischberger |date=2026-05-11}}</ref>
    
Daniel Friedman<ref>Daniel Friedman @DanFriedman81
 
Daniel Friedman<ref>Daniel Friedman @DanFriedman81
−
[https://x.com/DanFriedman81/status/2053989892917518765 May 11, 2026]</ref>,  others point out the New York Times' horrific reporting on the attack on Al Ahli hospital (Nov 2023) which turned out to be by jihadi rocket.  Kristof has repeatedly been misled by "Palestinian" sources in past reporting. He highlighted a previous case involving "Palestinian" [[[racist<ref><small>(On 9.25.20, replying to "Rabin was a peacemaker," Refaat: "so was Hitler."
+
[https://x.com/DanFriedman81/status/2053989892917518765 May 11, 2026]</ref>,  others assert the New York Times' horrific reporting on the attack on Al Ahli hospital (Nov 2023) which turned out to be by jihadi rocket.  Kristof has repeatedly been misled by "Palestinian" sources in past reporting. He highlighted a previous case involving "Palestinian" [[[racist<ref><small>(On 9.25.20, replying to "Rabin was a peacemaker," Refaat: "so was Hitler."
 
On 11.16.12 "you jew won;t understand, you will never, yo are a jew after all..." [sic]
 
On 11.16.12 "you jew won;t understand, you will never, yo are a jew after all..." [sic]
 
"are most jews evil? of course [sic] [Refaat wrote] they are...")</small></ref>]]] Refaat Alareer, who presented himself differently to a Times reporter than he did publicly elsewhere.  
 
"are most jews evil? of course [sic] [Refaat wrote] they are...")</small></ref>]]] Refaat Alareer, who presented himself differently to a Times reporter than he did publicly elsewhere.  
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
28,029

edits

Navigation menu