Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
239 bytes removed ,  16:27, July 6, 2007
Undo revision 219667 by Special:Contributions/KansasKreationist (User talk:KansasKreationist) -- Even from an evolutionary standpoint, the concept is flawed and inaccurate
Line 6: Line 6:     
The presence of sin caused also a gradual decline in human lifespans (Accounting for the extremally long lifespans of early biblical figures such as [[Noah]]) and moral turpitude, necessitating the advent of a [[Savior]]. The accumulation of sin-induced [[entropy]] gradually reduced lifespans and morals. Given sufficient time, this accumulation will become so great as to require the reconstruction of the earth, with the second coming of [[Christ]].
 
The presence of sin caused also a gradual decline in human lifespans (Accounting for the extremally long lifespans of early biblical figures such as [[Noah]]) and moral turpitude, necessitating the advent of a [[Savior]]. The accumulation of sin-induced [[entropy]] gradually reduced lifespans and morals. Given sufficient time, this accumulation will become so great as to require the reconstruction of the earth, with the second coming of [[Christ]].
  −
Biological and social [[evolution]] stands in stark opposition to this concept by proposing that men emerged from more primitive species and moved from darkness to civilization, enlightenment, and ever-increasing affluence and lifespans.
 
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu