nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
even though evolution is wrong, shouldn't we at least include their viewpoint, fair is fair, we aren't biased like Wikipedia is.
even though evolution is wrong, shouldn't we at least include their viewpoint, fair is fair, we aren't biased like Wikipedia is.
:Thanks for your thoughts, but that's not the evolutionary viewpoint. Biologically, the concept of "primitive" has little meaning. If we go by sophistication then plants are the ultimate life form having a much more complex genetic structure. And the social evolution part is even worse and is by no means agreed upon among historians. Only a small subset pushes it, but it is included in this article as having equal merit with overall scientific evolutionary theory, which isn't true. I hope this explanation is helpful for why I removed it. If you believe we should include an alternate perspective, we'll have to rewrite it. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 12:34, 6 July 2007 (EDT)