| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{ConservativeBible}} | | {{ConservativeBible}} |
| | The '''Conservative Bible Project''' renders [[God]]'s word without [[liberal denial]]. A ''Colbert Report'' interview featured this project.<ref>[http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly The Colbert Report Videos: Andy Schlafly], ColbertNation.com, December 8, 2009.</ref> Achievements include these 50 insights: | | The '''Conservative Bible Project''' renders [[God]]'s word without [[liberal denial]]. A ''Colbert Report'' interview featured this project.<ref>[http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly The Colbert Report Videos: Andy Schlafly], ColbertNation.com, December 8, 2009.</ref> Achievements include these 50 insights: |
| | + | #[[Samaritan]]s were as numerous as [[Judean]] [[Jew]]s at the time of [[Christ]], and much of the [[Gospels]] can be understood as part of the brilliant, successful strategy to quickly convert the Samaritans, who were in a bitter rivalry with the Judean Jews; |
| | #the Gospels of [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] and [[Gospel of John|John]], and the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], were written at the time of [[Jesus]], as proven in 40 ways,<ref>''See'' [[Date of Hebrews|16 confirmations that the Date of Hebrews was just after the Resurrection]], [[Date of John|10 reasons that the Gospel of John was contemporaneous with Jesus]], and [[date of the Gospel of Mark|14 proofs that the Gospel of Mark was contemporaneous]] too.</ref> and yet [[liberal denial]] asserts absurdly late dates and causes [[AI]] to mislead everyone; | | #the Gospels of [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] and [[Gospel of John|John]], and the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], were written at the time of [[Jesus]], as proven in 40 ways,<ref>''See'' [[Date of Hebrews|16 confirmations that the Date of Hebrews was just after the Resurrection]], [[Date of John|10 reasons that the Gospel of John was contemporaneous with Jesus]], and [[date of the Gospel of Mark|14 proofs that the Gospel of Mark was contemporaneous]] too.</ref> and yet [[liberal denial]] asserts absurdly late dates and causes [[AI]] to mislead everyone; |
| | #the [[Gospel of John]] is breathtakingly powerful in its logic -- "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us"<ref>{{bibleref|John|1|14}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> -- which overcomes [[anxiety]] by emphasizing [[eternal life]], and yet [[liberal]]s dilute and hide this; | | #the [[Gospel of John]] is breathtakingly powerful in its logic -- "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us"<ref>{{bibleref|John|1|14}} ([[ESV]]).</ref> -- which overcomes [[anxiety]] by emphasizing [[eternal life]], and yet [[liberal]]s dilute and hide this; |
| Line 47: |
Line 48: |
| | #translation committees are biased by their secret deliberations without public input, without insights from anyone having a [[STEM]] background, and without the perspective of [[Amish]] and other independent perspectives; | | #translation committees are biased by their secret deliberations without public input, without insights from anyone having a [[STEM]] background, and without the perspective of [[Amish]] and other independent perspectives; |
| | #the [[Gospel of John]] is incredibly powerful and life-changing, and even more so when occasional [[liberal]] "[[Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John|asides]]" that were later inserted into it are recognized as not part of the original;<ref>''See'' [[Undiluted Gospel of John]].</ref> | | #the [[Gospel of John]] is incredibly powerful and life-changing, and even more so when occasional [[liberal]] "[[Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John|asides]]" that were later inserted into it are recognized as not part of the original;<ref>''See'' [[Undiluted Gospel of John]].</ref> |
| − | #professors and secular encyclopedias often refer to a book by its ordering in most [[Bible]]s, such as "the fourth Gospel," but its ordering is arbitrary and not inspired, and thus a distraction in understanding and benefiting from the Bible;
| |
| | #John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> when a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness. | | #John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> when a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness. |
| | #the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide;<ref>As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and | | #the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide;<ref>As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and |