Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

John ending (view source)

Revision as of 00:17, July 5, 2026

1 byte removed ,  July 5
→‎Current scholarly debate
Line 73: Line 73:  
* Fr. Raymond E. Brown - as the preeminent [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] scholar on the [[Gospel of John]], Fr. Brown concluded that Chapter 21 was added after John had died.
 
* Fr. Raymond E. Brown - as the preeminent [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] scholar on the [[Gospel of John]], Fr. Brown concluded that Chapter 21 was added after John had died.
 
* Rudolf Bultmann - a leading 20th-century German theologian and skeptic felt that Chapter 21 was added to boost Peter and merge his community with John's followers.
 
* Rudolf Bultmann - a leading 20th-century German theologian and skeptic felt that Chapter 21 was added to boost Peter and merge his community with John's followers.
−
*Bart Ehrman - a prominent, but non-believing, former student of Bruce Metzger), views Chapter 21 as an afterthought and that John 20:30–31 is intended to be the book's conclusion.
+
*Bart Ehrman - a prominent, but non-believing, former student of Bruce Metzger, views Chapter 21 as an afterthought and that John 20:30–31 is intended to be the book's conclusion.
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,445

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/2198763"

Navigation menu