Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: − +
→Lame duck funding
====Lame duck funding====
====Lame duck funding====
On October 20, 2022, nineteen days before the [[2022 Midterm elections]] it was reported that amid concerns that a new Congress could take a more skeptical view of aid to Ukraine, members from both parties were looking to lock in billions of dollars in military assistance to the [[neo-fascist]] [[Kyiv regime]] before newly elected members were sworn in in January 2023.<ref>[https://thedreizinreport.com/2022/10/20/about-that-blank-check/ About that blank check...], Jacob Dreizen, October 20, 2022.</ref>
On October 20, 2022, nineteen days before the [[2022 Midterm elections]] it was reported that amid concerns that a new Congress could take a more skeptical view of aid to Ukraine, the [[UniParty]] was looking to lock in billions of dollars in military assistance to the [[neo-fascist]] [[Kyiv regime]] before newly elected members were sworn in in January 2023.<ref>[https://thedreizinreport.com/2022/10/20/about-that-blank-check/ About that blank check...], Jacob Dreizen, October 20, 2022.</ref>
The bipartisan idea under consideration would use an omnibus spending bill during the [[lame duck]] session to secure a much higher level of military and other assistance than prior aid packages for Ukraine.
The bipartisan idea under consideration would use an omnibus spending bill during the [[lame duck]] session to secure a much higher level of military and other assistance than prior aid packages for Ukraine.