Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 13:
Line 13: − +
→Category:User:Conservative proven wrong AGAIN
==[[Category:User:Conservative proven wrong]] [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Conservative_proven_wrong AGAIN]==
==[[Category:User:Conservative proven wrong]] [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Conservative_proven_wrong AGAIN]==
[[User:Conservative]] has misrepresented the views of Rear Admiral [[James Stavridis]] is his more than 4 dozen [[warmongering]] [[troll]] screeds.
[[User:Conservative]] has misrepresented the views of Rear Admiral [[James Stavridis]] in his more than 4 dozen [[warmongering]] [[troll]] screeds.
*On March 2, 2025 the ''[[London Telegraph]]'' reported former Supreme Allied Commander [[US Navy]] Four Star Admiral [[James Stavridis]] said that since the [[Trump administration]] made it clear that '''[[Ukraine aid|aid to Kyiv]] could become a "[[geopolitical]] miscalculation of colossal proportions....We may be witnessing the last days of [[NATO]]".'''<ref>[https://archive.is/QrPQA End of Nato alliance could be ‘days away’, warns former commander], Cameron Henderson, ''[[The Telegraph]]'', 01 March 2025. www.telegraph.co.uk</ref>
*On March 2, 2025 the ''[[London Telegraph]]'' reported former Supreme Allied Commander [[US Navy]] Four Star Admiral [[James Stavridis]] said that since the [[Trump administration]] made it clear that '''[[Ukraine aid|aid to Kyiv]] could become a "[[geopolitical]] miscalculation of colossal proportions....We may be witnessing the last days of [[NATO]]".'''<ref>[https://archive.is/QrPQA End of Nato alliance could be ‘days away’, warns former commander], Cameron Henderson, ''[[The Telegraph]]'', 01 March 2025. www.telegraph.co.uk</ref>
*Whenever a rising power (in this case [[China]]) confronts an established power (the [[U.S.]]) over the past two thousand years, the outcome very often leads to a global conflict. This occurs despite the fact that in most cases there is no advantage to either side in launching into a [[war]].<ref>[https://time.com/5945178/sleepwalk-war-with-china/ How the U.S. Could Sleepwalk into a War with China], [[James Stavridis]] and Elliot Ackerman, ''[[TIME magazine]]'', Mar 9, 2021. </ref>
*Whenever a rising power (in this case [[China]]) confronts an established power (the [[U.S.]]) over the past two thousand years, the outcome very often leads to a global conflict. This occurs despite the fact that in most cases there is no advantage to either side in launching into a [[war]].<ref>[https://time.com/5945178/sleepwalk-war-with-china/ How the U.S. Could Sleepwalk into a War with China], [[James Stavridis]] and Elliot Ackerman, ''[[TIME magazine]]'', Mar 9, 2021. </ref>
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}