Changes

In desperation to attack Justice Clarence Thomas, ''ProPublica'' even recycled old news about him.  

In desperation to attack Justice Clarence Thomas, ''ProPublica'' even recycled old news about him.  

'The site accuses the justice of legal violations—but he was officially cleared more than a decade earlier.'

"The site accuses the justice of legal violations—but he was officially cleared more than a decade earlier."<ref name="WSJ">Mark Paoletta, [https://www.wsj.com/articles/propublica-recycles-old-clarence-thomas-news-trips-crow-judicial-conference-investigation-b9d23640?mod=opinion_lead_pos7 ''ProPublica'' Recycles Old Clarence Thomas News], ''WSJ'', June 4, 2023</ref>

{{Cquote|The first attack in the left’s spring offensive against the U.S. Supreme Court was an April 6 (2023) ProPublica hit piece about Justice Clarence Thomas. The site quotes “ethics experts” who accuse him of violating federal law by not disclosing trips he had taken with a longtime friend. The accusation turns out to be old news that was adjudicated more than a decade ago.<ref>Mark Paoletta, [https://www.wsj.com/articles/propublica-recycles-old-clarence-thomas-news-trips-crow-judicial-conference-investigation-b9d23640?mod=opinion_lead_pos7 ''ProPublica'' Recycles Old Clarence Thomas News], ''WSJ'', June 4, 2023</ref>}}

{{Cquote|The first attack in the left’s spring offensive against the U.S. Supreme Court was an April 6 (2023) ProPublica hit piece about Justice Clarence Thomas. The site quotes “ethics experts” who accuse him of violating federal law by not disclosing trips he had taken with a longtime friend. The accusation turns out to be old news that was adjudicated more than a decade ago.<ref name="WSJ"/>}}

==Views on racism==

==Views on racism==