Changes

394 bytes added ,  06:43, July 7, 2007
→‎To "Sir" or not to "Sir": What argument was shown to be wrong?
Line 137: Line 137:  
::::::You've failed to provide an adequate arguments, so I'm putting his title back in.
 
::::::You've failed to provide an adequate arguments, so I'm putting his title back in.
 
::::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
 
::::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::: What argument was shown to be wrong? Show me one person outside of England who even knows what the title means. I looked up the Jefferson letter. It seems to be part of some sort of sarcastic put-down of negro literature. It doesn't make a good argument in this case. Why do you want to put the title in? It is redundant, at best. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 02:43, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
    
==Changed Leibniz calculus dispute statement==
 
==Changed Leibniz calculus dispute statement==